Trump Wins Praise For Iran Nuclear Strikes – From Pence
In a stunning turn of events that has sent shockwaves through the international community, former President Donald Trump has launched targeted nuclear strikes against Iran’s key military facilities. While the move has ignited global outrage and fears of escalating conflict, it has drawn vocal support from one familiar figure—former Vice President Mike Pence.
A Shocking Military Move
The strikes, which were confirmed by multiple U.S. intelligence sources and later acknowledged by Trump himself, targeted Iran’s underground nuclear enrichment facilities, military airbases, and missile sites. Reports suggest that the strikes employed tactical nuclear weapons designed to cause limited but devastating destruction to hardened military targets without the widespread fallout of strategic nuclear warheads.
Trump, who has long criticized Iran’s nuclear ambitions, stated that the operation was a “necessary step to protect America, Israel, and the world from an imminent threat.” His remarks came during a press conference held at his Mar-a-Lago residence, where he addressed supporters and media just hours after the strikes were carried out.
Pence’s Public Endorsement
Perhaps the most surprising reaction came from Mike Pence, Trump’s former vice president, who has had a strained relationship with Trump since the January 6 Capitol riots. In a statement released via his official social media channels, Pence declared:
“Today, President Trump demonstrated decisive leadership in the face of a grave threat. Iran has repeatedly defied international norms and pursued nuclear weapons that endanger the safety of America and our allies. While no one seeks war, strength is the only language rogue regimes understand.”
Pence’s words are being viewed by political analysts as a significant gesture, considering his previous distance from Trump following their post-2020 election fallout. His public backing is interpreted as an attempt to bridge gaps within the fractured Republican Party and align with Trump’s foreign policy legacy.
Divided Political Response
Within the United States, reactions are deeply polarized. Trump’s loyal supporters have rallied around the decision, praising it as a bold action against a long-standing adversary. Conservative media outlets have framed the strikes as a necessary move to dismantle Iran’s dangerous capabilities and restore American strength on the global stage.
Republican lawmakers like Senator Lindsey Graham and Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene issued statements echoing Pence’s praise.
“This is the leadership we need,” said Graham. “For years, Iran has laughed at weak American presidents. No longer.”
However, the Democratic response has been swift and harsh. President Joe Biden, addressing the nation from the White House, condemned the strikes as “reckless and destabilizing,” warning that they could trigger a broader regional war.
“This unilateral action was carried out without Congressional authorization and without consultation with our allies. It puts American lives at risk and undermines decades of diplomatic progress,” Biden said.
Global Shock and Condemnation
International reactions have been overwhelmingly negative. The United Nations Security Council convened an emergency session within hours, with multiple nations, including Russia, China, Germany, and France, condemning the strikes.
The Iranian government confirmed the damage to several military sites but denied that their nuclear program was intended for weapons development. Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi, in a televised address, vowed retaliation.
“This act of nuclear aggression will not go unanswered. Iran will defend its sovereignty with all available means,” Raisi declared.
Meanwhile, Israel, one of America’s closest allies in the Middle East and a nation historically concerned with Iran’s nuclear ambitions, expressed cautious support.
“Israel stands with any action that reduces the threat of a nuclear-armed Iran,” said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, though he stopped short of explicitly endorsing the use of nuclear weapons.
Military and Strategic Implications
Defense analysts are now debating whether the use of tactical nuclear weapons marks a dangerous new chapter in modern warfare. The decision to cross the nuclear threshold, even in a limited capacity, has rarely been seen since World War II.
Retired General David Petraeus, speaking to CNN, warned:
“This is a Rubicon that once crossed, cannot be easily uncrossed. Other nations will now rethink their own nuclear postures. North Korea, Russia, China—they’re all watching.”
Military sources suggest that the strikes successfully destroyed Iran’s primary uranium enrichment sites deep underground, setting back their nuclear program by years. However, the long-term consequences are unclear. Iran’s missile forces remain capable of retaliatory strikes against U.S. bases in the region, Israel, and Saudi Arabia.
Pence’s Political Calculation
Mike Pence’s support has also reignited speculation about his future political ambitions. Having struggled to balance his role as a principled conservative with his former loyalty to Trump, Pence’s statement may signal a pivot toward regaining favor with the Republican base ahead of the 2028 presidential election.
Political strategist Rick Wilson commented:
“Pence is walking a fine line. He knows the GOP base loves strength, and foreign policy toughness has always played well. But aligning himself with the use of nuclear weapons is a gamble—especially when much of the world is recoiling.”
Some view Pence’s move as an effort to restore the image of the Trump-Pence partnership, particularly among evangelical voters who remain a powerful force in Republican primaries.
A Fractured Future
As the world grapples with the immediate fallout, one thing is certain: the use of nuclear weapons has fundamentally altered the diplomatic landscape. American allies in Europe are scrambling to respond, with NATO calling an emergency summit.
Markets worldwide reacted sharply. Oil prices skyrocketed over fears of a broader Middle East war, while stock markets dipped as investors sought safe havens.
At home, protests erupted in several major U.S. cities, with demonstrators chanting against war and nuclear escalation. Meanwhile, Trump supporters staged counter-rallies, waving flags and banners reading, “America First. Iran Last.”
Where It Goes From Here
In the coming days, much will depend on how Iran responds. Will they pursue a direct military retaliation, escalate through proxy forces like Hezbollah, or seek diplomatic channels to avoid full-scale war?
Meanwhile, Washington is bracing for the diplomatic, military, and political fallout. The Biden administration faces mounting pressure to clarify its own stance while preventing further escalation.
As for Donald Trump, the strikes cement his legacy as a figure willing to take extreme measures in pursuit of what he views as national security. Whether history will judge this decision as a courageous stand against tyranny or a reckless gamble remains to be seen.
Pence’s endorsement has, at least for now, reminded Americans that in times of global crisis, even fractured political relationships can shift dramatically.
Conclusion
Trump’s decision to strike Iran’s nuclear facilities with tactical nuclear weapons marks one of the most controversial military decisions of the 21st century. While it has drawn fervent praise from Mike Pence and other Republican allies, it has also sparked global condemnation, fears of broader conflict, and an uncertain future.
The world now watches, holding its breath, waiting to see if this bold move leads to a safer world—or unleashes consequences far beyond anyone’s control.
